A CONUNDRUM. QUESTION FOR ATHEISTS, NON GOD CONFORMISTS & RELIGIOUS LEADERS

An effort to keep a bored mind active today i set to work reading and as i read i found my mind wondering to the point of asking about the origins of the universe and the issue behind creation or “emergence” of the universe and how this came to be.

One predominant school of thought believe the universe was created and that something/someone much bigger than our universe “caused” it to come into existence.

Another left wing school of thought believe that our universe began at a point zero known as the Big Bang which caused what was at that time to expand and the ripple effect chain reaction was what brought about our universe. They attribute this to simple Energy.

However here is my conundrum and it is from the Law of conservation of mass or otherwise called The principle of mass conservation.

The law of conservation of mass or principle of mass conservation states that for any system closed to all transfers of matter and energy, the mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system’s mass cannot change, so quantity can neither be added nor be removed. Hence, the quantity of mass is conserved over time.

The law implies that mass can neither be created nor destroyed, although it may be rearranged in space, or the entities associated with it may be changed in form.

So if matter cannot be created nor destroyed why do so many scientists believe in the Big Bang theory?

The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological description of the development of the Universe. Under this theory, space and time emerged together billions of years ago after a huge burst of energy BUT the law of conservation of mass is directly against this theory!!

Rather this Law points at something the creation advocates have been saying all along and that is that SOMETHING or SOMEONE “caused” our universe to begin to exist. How you say? Please follow the explanation of this law and it states that …

“The mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system’s mass cannot change, so quantity can neither be added nor be removed. Hence, the quantity of mass is conserved over time. The law implies that mass can neither be created nor destroyed, although it may be rearranged in space, or the entities associated with it may be changed in form“

Well Christians lay claim that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh so Jesus IS GOD.

Quoting from Hebrews 13:8 it states that “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today, and forever” So if Jesus is God then replace Jesus Christ in that verse with GOD and it would read, “GOD is the same yesterday, today, and forever“

That statement about God being the same and unchanging is a perfect match to the law of Conservation of mass which states that The mass of the system must remain constant over time, as system’s mass cannot change, so quantity can neither be added nor be removed. Hence, the quantity of mass is conserved over time

Does this not imply that the original Mass behind the “emergence” of our universe though caused a change but is in itself unchanging?

If Scientists claim Energy was behind this then how did this energy begin to exist since same law says energy cannot be created or destroyed? The problem here is the word ENERGY and the moment you replace the word ENERGY with GOD it begins to make more sense.

Energy could not have just appeared it needed to have been in existence already but this would take us to an infinite timeline since energy cannot be created or destroyed. Christians says God has always been. He was not created and cannot be destroyed… Is this not the same as Energy?

They say he created everything else but was himself not created. This means This God “Energy” at a point disrupted the trend Energy follows and caused a “change” in Energy and thus an emergence of matter but thereafter the law of conservation of mass kicked in as everything reverted to status quo as such cannot be repeated.

Just thinking out loud from my head to my fingers as i type this.

I would need some scientific Atheists or some science guru in general to break this down in an attempt at disengaging the above from God and clearly bringing a line of demarcation between ENERGY and GOD. IS ENERGY just ENERGY or Did Energy gain its EMERGENCE FROM GOD WHO IS THE FIRST LIVING ENERGY?

Your thoughts people.